I hate elections
Jan. 18th, 2006 07:22 amI've been avoiding the debates and ads as much as I can, but it tends to filter its way down anyway. Here is the filtered impression I get from each of the major parties.
Liberal: Blah blah blah Stephen Harper will eat your children, vote for us blah blah blah
Conservative: Blah blah blah Paul Martin is a crook, vote for us blah blah blah
NDP: Blah blah blah Paul Martin is a crook, vote for anybody but him blah blah blah Wait! We meant vote for us! Uh... medicare! Blah blah blah
BQ: Blah blah blah Quebec Quebec Quebec Quebec Quebec blah blah blah
The problem that I have as a voter is that they all strike me as self-serving little men with nary a scrap of vision or credibility between them.
---
Overheard in the elevator this morning: Opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one, but nobody wants to hear about yours.
Liberal: Blah blah blah Stephen Harper will eat your children, vote for us blah blah blah
Conservative: Blah blah blah Paul Martin is a crook, vote for us blah blah blah
NDP: Blah blah blah Paul Martin is a crook, vote for anybody but him blah blah blah Wait! We meant vote for us! Uh... medicare! Blah blah blah
BQ: Blah blah blah Quebec Quebec Quebec Quebec Quebec blah blah blah
The problem that I have as a voter is that they all strike me as self-serving little men with nary a scrap of vision or credibility between them.
---
Overheard in the elevator this morning: Opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one, but nobody wants to hear about yours.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 07:59 pm (UTC)The word "about" can be removed from that statement, resulting in much potty-related hilarity.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 08:26 pm (UTC)A very sad day indeed.
You know things have gotten bad when one of the candidates (Harper) argues that you should vote for his party because 'even if we get a majority, the courts and senate will keep us under control...'. I mean... sheesh.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 12:15 am (UTC)Mister Harper is counting on the voters to have very short memories when he says things like that. For one thing, the courts can't do much to keep him in check when he has the "notwithstanding" trump card to play. It's the government's get-out-of-jail-free card to play when they don't like a ruling by the supreme court.
The second minor issue is that of the senate. I'm old enough to remember when an earlier Conservative government wanted to pass a bit of legislation to enact the G.S.T. The Senate was controlled by Liberals at the time, and they made noises about sending the bill back for modifications. That didn't stump Brian; he simply had the number of senate seats expanded and appointed enough of his personal cronies to make sure that the legislation got rubber-stamped in the senate.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 12:27 am (UTC)That's the thing - just last year Harper was talking about converting the Senate to being elected (which would work in his favour, of course), and he and other Con MPs were complaining about how it's inappropriate for the Supreme Court to override 'elected politicians' and 'subverting democracy'...
Now he's ok with this?
I think not.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-18 11:04 pm (UTC)Stephen Harper was in the store the other day, and told the clerk that he had a "cue-pon".
Not "coo-pon".
He really said it.
We're not making this up.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-19 08:24 pm (UTC)I loved that one much more than the "Harper wants to give guns to babies" ad.