plonq: (Whatever)
[personal profile] plonq
Somebody posted a question today asking why some of us out here found the Friendship is Witchcraft series of overdubs to be funny. His question was worded to imply that we should not find it funny since he did not find it funny.

I gave a fairly short answer, talking about how the series brought in various elements of satire, parody, irony and absurdity which all appealed to humour touch points for me. In the end, though, I concluded that one either gets humour, or one does not and there is little that others can say that would explain a joke funny to somebody who does not share the same sense of humour.

So I concluded, "Some of us find it funny because it is funny."

When I probe into the essence of what makes me laugh though, it occurs to me that my sense of humour has changed considerably over the years. While my late-teens self might disagree if we were to meet today, I think that my sense of humour is more sophisticated now than it was at one time. I have seen enough episodes of Regular Show and Adventure Time to know that the shows do not hold a strong appeal for me. I don't hate them, but the flavour of shallow absurdism that seems to drive the humour and the plot lines gets very thin very quickly. Yet I can see how I might have liked these shows 30-35 years ago.

On the other hand, I have really enjoyed shows like Simpsons, South Park and even Beavis & Butthead (seriously, the movie was great) where there is no less absurdity, but it is layered like a syrup over a dense foundation of satire. The first time I saw This Is Spinal Tap I nearly laughed myself to incontinence. I guess I could say that I prefer my humour to make a statement on the human condition.

Does this mean that I don't like absurdity unless it is steeped in satire or irony? If so, then how does that explain my love for Monty Python's Flying Circus? I don't think I could find a trout large enough to beat any social commentary out of their sketch on the Ministry of Silly Walks, for instance.

Again, I find that I simply have to fall back on the explanation that it is funny because it is funny. Somewhere in my brain, certain visuals, concepts, or sounds can trigger pathways that my mind finds pleasing in an amusing way. I cannot explain how it is wired, or why some things simply strike me as funny. If I could remove my brain and plug it into a machine to track my mental pathways, I would be dead. But somebody else might be able to trace the pathways and explain it to you. Let's not do that and leave it as a thought experiment for now.

Date: 2014-04-18 12:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dronon.livejournal.com
I love absurd humour, but I find it hard to describe what makes some of it click with me, or sometimes doesn't. For me, while it doesn't have to be layered or built upon a satirical base, it needs to have a... strange poetry to it, an internal structure, patterns amid the silliness, that seems to help. Just random stuff being thrown around gets old fast.

When I was younger, I used to believe confusing the audience played a good part, only over time I saw that it tended to be used abusively, trying to pretend something was deep, or the comedians were just letting an inner asshole hide behind the shield of comedy.

Absurdism also gets mixed with other comedy style, and that's where I flounder. The more purile and toilet humour, the more difficult it becomes for me to enjoy it. So Adventure Time is borderline; I could never enjoy Beavis and Butthead. The first Austin Powers movie walked a fragile line right along my tolerance levels.

April 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 10:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios