"But the special effects were good"
May. 4th, 2009 10:59 amI was originally going to post about something else, but I've been discussing movies with a co-worker and the more we speak, the more I have come to conclude that he represents the reason why we keep getting so many bad shows out of Hollywood. He was gushing about the latest X-Men, and when I mentioned that it was getting pretty mediocre reviews from the critics and from pretty much everyone I know who has seen it, he got a bit defensive and suggested that people were going to see it with their expectations set too high. Apparently it has pretty good special effects.
The conversation then migrated to television. We both agreed on many of the better shows in current (or recently finished) running, and I mentioned that the theme shared between all of the shows was that they had solid writing. I steered it back to movies then, and suggested that writing was the difference between the first three Star Wars, and the more recent abominations bearing the same name. Once again he got defensive, saying that he really liked the last three movies.
Me: "But the writing was horrible, especially the dialogue. Everything that made the first three movies so great was missing from the later ones."
Him: "Ya, but people don't go to these movies for the writing. Sure, the writing was pretty bad, and the dialogue was pretty brutal - especially the love scenes - but the special effects were good."
Oy.
The conversation then migrated to television. We both agreed on many of the better shows in current (or recently finished) running, and I mentioned that the theme shared between all of the shows was that they had solid writing. I steered it back to movies then, and suggested that writing was the difference between the first three Star Wars, and the more recent abominations bearing the same name. Once again he got defensive, saying that he really liked the last three movies.
Me: "But the writing was horrible, especially the dialogue. Everything that made the first three movies so great was missing from the later ones."
Him: "Ya, but people don't go to these movies for the writing. Sure, the writing was pretty bad, and the dialogue was pretty brutal - especially the love scenes - but the special effects were good."
Oy.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-04 04:31 pm (UTC)Oh, wait...
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-04 06:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-04 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 12:24 am (UTC)But I still agree with you! But you should really see it, it's amazing.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 12:54 am (UTC)I think my inner geek will actually find the unfinished special effects even cooler than the completed ones.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 01:00 am (UTC)A lot of the dialogue was stilted, a couple bits to the point of being painful, but I think deep down inside Star Wars is more than that to me... I think I'm in love with Lucas' anal attention to detail. I think (maybe because of my attention span), I also have the ability to quickly forget the parts I don't like and focus on the bits I do.
I do like Lucas' special effects, but at the same time I also lament them at the same time... I'm a huge fan of using "cheap" effects to come up with amazing special effects, the whole by-hook-or-by-crook motif. One of the items that sticks on my mind is a photo of filming a Death Star fly-by, which consisted of a large model on its side and the crew sitting in the back of a truck driving by. There was something more "solid" about real models versus the whiz-bang effects. But I digress.
I think I've got so much loaded into Star Wars that I have trouble being critical.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-05 06:43 am (UTC)